They were manipulated to believe that if they don’t do whatever Lalit is saying then something bad will happen to the family. The reason behind this was that they believed all of this was coming from the head patriarch, the grandfather. The hair-raising details mentioned in the diary shows how the family used to blindly follow whatever Lalit used to say. We see how Lalit’s psychosis soon became a shared psychosis of the family. The void of authority that the grandfather had left was filled by Lalit. Through the diary entries, it is revealed that Lalit used to hear his father’s voice and command his family what to do. This also shows how normal it is for women in usual Indian households to have zero agency to voice out their opinion or will.įurther, we see in the documentary, Lalit Bhatia the youngest son of the grandfather who allegedly had an undiagnosed mental illness fills the void of that patriarch in the family. The documentary highlights the gender roles where a male head of an average Indian family holds importance. Lalit would ‘hear’ his dead father’s voice & command the family!
His father has never said no but he does hold the veto power. He talks about how even today his wife cannot go out without the consent of his father. He comments that in an Indian family like his family, the oldest male member of the house, holds veto power and authority. Unfortunately, Murray's charismatic inventor rarely makes an appearance up until the very end, which certainly feels like a waste of potential after seeing the entertaining possibilities with Haven.Never miss real stories from India's women.
Thankfully, they still manage to keep their characters interesting, finding plenty of ways to round them out and make them a little more complex than the stereotypes they're doled out at the beginning. As each character slowly begins to gather points, Haven's presence begins to loom a little larger over the narrative, causing these teens to unravel at the seams. This is especially true for Chynoweth's Sophia, who steals the show as the self-absorbed social media influencer. Thankfully, each one is truly reveling in their respective roles. These scenes with Haven are few and far between right-off-the-bat, with the eager-to-win-teens taking center stage most of the time. As a viewer, it's something you long to see more of, and ultimately, leaves you a little disappointed in the lack of it by the end. It's these scenes, in particular, where the film takes a daring leap from the familiar territory it's treading and finds great success. Still, it finds its footing when it comes to Haven and the challenges within the house. Its narrative, which feels strikingly similar to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory with a little bit of The Breakfast Club sprinkled on top, feels almost too comfortable in its archetypes.
But, even with Haven providing some very unsettling introspective moments to the film, cheesy writing on top of familiar plot devices makes Max Winslow fall short of being a family-friendly success story. Sirtis brings an unnerving energy to Haven that helps to elevate Jeff Wild's script when it falls flat.
#House of secrets rating movie
These are the moments when the movie reaches its peak.
0 kommentar(er)
